Complete reference and brain dump information about Adobe 9A0-602 exam
|Exam Name||:||Certified Macromedia Flash MX 2004 Developer|
|Questions and Answers||:||130 Q & A|
|Updated On||:||February 21, 2019|
|PDF Download Mirror||:||9A0-602 Brain Dump|
|Get Full Version||:||Killexams 9A0-602 Full Version|
I were given wonderful Questions and solutions for my 9A0-602 exam.
Hats down the fine 9A0-602 exam preparation option. I passed my 9A0-602 exam ultimate week, and this set of exam questions and solutions has been very helpful. these items from killexams.com is actual. before creating a purchase, I contacted customer support with questions on how up to date their material are, and they showed that they update all exams on almost every day basis. They add updates where vital, or honestly double check the content to make certain its updated. It justifies buying an exam brain sell off. With killexams.com, I recognise that i will rely on the cutting-edge exam material, now not some e book which can emerge as obsolete a week after its posted. So I assume this is the quality exam preparation option. I suppose im able to expand my certification portfolio into a few different providers, Im just not positive which of them but. but what Im sure approximately is that I may be the use of killexams.com as my predominant training resource.
nice to pay attention that modern-day dumps of 9A0-602 exam are available.
I prepared 9A0-602 with the help of killexams.com and found that they have pretty accurate stuff. I will go for other Adobe tests as rightly.
strive out the ones real 9A0-602 cutting-edge-day and updated dumps.
I were given 76% in 9A0-602 exam. Thanks to the team of killexams.com for making my attempt so easy. I propose to new customers to prepare thru killexams.com as its very complete.
in which am i able to download 9A0-602 state-of-the-art dumps?
high-quality stuff for 9A0-602 exam which has virtually helped me skip. i have been dreaming about the 9A0-602 career for a while, but may want to never make time to test and in fact get licensed. As a whole lot as i was uninterested in books and publications, I could not make time and simply test. those 9A0-602 Q&A made exam education totally sensible. I even managed to test in my car whilst using to work. The handy layout, and yes, the exam simulator is as top because the internet site claims its far and the accurate 9A0-602 questions have helped me get my dream certification.
No cheaper source of 9A0-602 Q&A found but.
these days im very glad due to the fact i have were given a completely high score in my 9A0-602 exam. I couldnt assume i would be capable of do it however this killexams.com made me assume in any other case. the net educators are doing their activity thoroughly and that i salute them for their determination and devotion.
truely attempted 9A0-602 query financial institution as quickly as and i am convinced.
As I had one and most effective week close by earlier than the exam 9A0-602. So, I depended on upon the Q&A of killexams.com for fast reference. It contained brief-duration replies in a systemic way. Massive way to you, you change my international. That is the great exam solution inside the occasion that i have restricted time.
were given most 9A0-602 Quiz in actual test that I organized.
With the usage of tremendous products of killexams.com, I had scored ninety two percent marks in 9A0-602 certification. I become searching for reliable test dump to boom my information stage. Technical concepts and difficult language of my certification changed into hard to understand consequently I become in search of dependable and smooth test merchandise. I had come to recognize this internet site for the training of professional certification. It changed into no longer an smooth activity however simplest killexams.com has made this activity easy for me. I am feeling right for my success and this platform is fine for me.
I found a very good source of 9A0-602 material.
Thanks to killexams.com team who gives very treasured practice questions and answers with elements. i have cleared 9A0-602 exam with 95% marks. Thank U very much on your offerings. i have subcribed to questions banks of killexams.com like 9A0-602. The questions banks have been very helpful for me to clear those exams. Your mock tests helped a lot in clearing my 9A0-602 exam with 95%. To the thing, unique and rightly described solutions. Keep up the best work.
9A0-602 exam isn't any greater tough with these QAs.
You need to ace your online 9A0-602 tests I even have a pleasant and easy manner of this and this is killexams.com and its 9A0-602 test examples papers which are a real image of very last test of 9A0-602 exam tests. My percent in very last test is 95%. killexams.com is a product for individuals who usually want to move on of their life and need to do something more normal. 9A0-602 trial test has the potential to enhance your self assurance level.
do this splendid supply state-of-the-art real test Questions.
i might doubtlessly suggest it to my partners and accomplices. I were given 360 of imprints. i used to be enchanted with the outcomes I got with the help test manual 9A0-602 exam path material. I usually thought actual and extensive research have been the response to all or any exams, until I took the assistance of killexams.com brain dump to pass my exam 9A0-602. extremely satisfy.
The design arm of ALTEN community, Calsoft Labs has just announced it has reached an agreement with Freescale to certify Adobe Flash participant on i.MX51 purposes processor platform
under agreement, Calsoft Labs might be allowed to commercially distribute Adobe Flash player 10.1 on Freescale's i.MX51 construction platforms.
Calsoft Labs is a well-recognized Adobe scaling associate and presents Flash player porting, certification and improve capabilities in addition to Flash player licenses.
The company is a vital participant within the smartphone market and it has efficiently completed numerous Flash participant ports to a considerable number of operating systems, together with Android.
â€śThe i.MX51 family unit of processors with ARM Cortex A8 CPU operating at as speedy as 800 MHz is premier for working rich Flash based content on a wide range of multimedia devices. An accelerated Flash participant solution will permit OEMs to bring laptop-like browser experiences on tablet category contraptions,â€ť mentioned Anand Joshi, vp of Digital domestic expertise BU at Calsoft Labs.
The i.MX51 functions processor platform is geared toward a bigger range of CE applications corresponding to tablets and other gadgets, together with smartphones that require high efficiency and low vigour.
â€śOur collaboration with Calsoft Labs skill that i.MX51 customers can now extra utterly leverage the Flash player. aid for optimized, wealthy looking of Flash based content is essential for our customers. a certified reference platform is expected to in the reduction of time to market for OEMs constructing their gadgets the use of our advanced i.MX51 platform,â€ť pointed out Rajeev Kumar, i.MX product line manager for Freescale's Multimedia applications Division.
in line with the ARM Cortex- A8 CPU, the i.MX51 integrates a hardware video decoder and will assist a few video codecs including H.264, On2 VP6, and Sorenson Spark.
youngsters, hardware decoded videos could be required to allow first-rate playback of video content on the web from various web sites, together with YouTube.
Editorâ€™s be aware: here's a guest submit written by way of Jeremy Allaire, founder and CEO of Brightcove. previous to Brightcove, Jeremy centered Allaire organization which changed into consequently obtained with the aid of Macromedia as a result of the success of their web development tool ColdFusion. At Macromedia, Jeremy helped create the Macromedia MX (Flash) platform. that you can see a fresh interview of Jeremy right here. As probably the most guys who helped construct the Flash Platform, we requested him to weigh in on the contemporary HTML5 v. Flash debate.
The contemporary introduction of the new Apple iPad has stirred the discussion over the future of web content material and application runtime codecs, and shone mild onto the political and business battles rising between Apple, Adobe and Google. These dialogue are sometimes highly polarized and irrational. My hope during this put up is to aid provide some stability and readability onto this discussion.
I actually have a particularly wonderful viewpoint, stake and position in this discussion. My first company (Allaire) changed into born throughout the creation of the net, with the concept that a browser and HTML might kind the basis for growing content-wealthy, interactive application purposes, ones that didnâ€™t require native code and will be platform and operating equipment independent. We built ColdFusion as a way to know this imaginative and prescient. We later grew to become deeply dedicated to the realm of HTML as a developer structure, acquiring and building HomeSite, what become the worldâ€™s dominant windows-based HTML authoring application.
In 2000, it grew to become clear to me that net functions and runtimes were now not advancing fast ample, and that with the emerging world of broadband internet connectivity that a completely new realm of wealthy information superhighway applications could be possible. We (Allaire and Macromedia) merged our companies with the imaginative and prescient that a brand new classification of browser-based applications would emerge, and that we could evolve Macromedia Flash player from its origins as an animation and motion-photographs engine into a true application platform and wealthy client runtime that fused media (text, audio, images, video), communications (net services, real-time APIs) and interactivity (wealthy customer-facet object model and UI element framework). In March of 2002 we launched the Macromedia MX Platform, anchored across the new Flash runtime, and realized this imaginative and prescient for the transformation of the net journey and enabling a brand new classification of rich, browser-based mostly applications.
these days, my enterprise sits at the center of those new battles over the future of net content material and app formats and runtimes. We work with heaps of media publishers who goal to maximise the distribution, attain and user opportunities with their content. This new re-fracturing of net content runtimes is growing challenges (and alternatives) for us and our peers.A combat for the Hearts and Minds of developers (and Audiences!)
I believe itâ€™s crucial to first frame and be mindful this dialogue with the broader political economic climate of information superhighway utility structures. most of the debate and dialogue over HTML5 vs. Flash vs. Native Apps has little to do with what is the appropriate technical method, or whether whatever thing is open or closed, it has to do with the expressions of vigor and control that pressure the businesses of the webâ€™s dominant platform companies â€” Apple, Adobe, Google and Microsoft.
each of those corporations seeks to create entertaining runtimes and APIs that supply a strategic wedge that may force other elements of their business. At one degree here's a combat for the hearts and minds of developers and ISVs, however these builders are only a way to an conclusion. Gaining large adoption for his or her runtime structures interprets into their ability to create big derivative cost via downstream items and features. For Apple, this is hardware and paid media (content material and apps) sales. For Google, here's about developing big attain for his or her advertising structures and products. For Adobe, this about developing main new purposes agencies based on their platform. For Microsoft, it is set driving unit sales of their core OS and business applications.web Apps and content material
Iâ€™m frequently asked â€śWill HTML5 exchange Flash?â€ť on the net. The brief answer isn't any. besides the fact that children, there's lots of nuance here and itâ€™s effective to make the big difference between two extensive classes of content material applications that are deployed in browsers.
The 2d wide classification of purposes are what i might name wealthy Media Apps. These sorts of applications consist of largely client-facing, viewers and media centric experiences. In selected, this contains online video, rich media promoting and advertising, and on-line video games (informal video games). All of these forms of purposes are incredibly focused on having a superb and immersive journey that just works, and the creators of those apps are very concentrated on audience attain â€” the rest that impedes one hundred% buyer acceptance is a significant concern. here, Flash is dominant. The enjoyable runtime characteristics of Flash, mixed with its striking attain, has led these forms of apps to become particularly dependent on Flash, and massive quantities of the broadband economic climate are based on it. It seems unlikely that HTML5 can be in any respect placed to exchange Flash for these categories, even though it is clearly value observing how consistent wealthy media runtimes locate their approach into the HTML5+ average. at the moment, it's a non starter.the handheld Disruption
lots of the above classes of content functions are in reference to the pc/Browser-based mostly web. The explosive boom in hand held computing has delivered a completely new dynamic into the content and app run-time battles which in turn could have a cascading impact on the notebook web. hand-held computing comprises smartphones (iPhone, Android, Nokia, et. al), transportable track/entertainment devices and tablet computing contraptions (iPad and Android contraptions).
in lots of respects, the a hit launch and growth of those gadgets has created a completely new and generally clean canvas for content and purposes. First, these contraptions offer new native features and OS-particular features (region, multi-contact UI, local media, instant networking APIs, cameras, offline) that are giving birth to a enormous new category of non-internet Apps that are developed the usage of proprietary native-code APIs and runtimes. as a result of always-on broadband connectivity and straightforward to discovery App retailers, there has been swift adoption of these new â€śdisposable content material appsâ€ť.
hand-held structures create a brand new probability for platform carriers to disrupt runtime hegemony from platforms which have viewed ascendance on the workstation/net, and controlling these new run-instances and developer adoption of those runtimes has a direct have an impact on on these platform vendors ability to personal viewers relationships and monetization opportunities. for instance, a web-centric, HTML5-centric handheld world favors Google since it can leverage itâ€™s existing dominance in search and net advertising. A proprietary App-centric universe favors Apple since it can turn into the fundamental gatekeeper to attaining the cellular audience and already has a pole position in integrating payments and promoting into content purposes.
in the case of hand-held structures, besides the fact that children, it seems reasonably apparent that it is not a nil-sum video game. Three runtime structures will gain adoption and infrequently even inter-mingle â€” HTML5 content and apps, Native Apps (that may also comprise Flash and HTML content), and HTML5 apps that include and leverage Flash participant. there is a prosperous pallet of capabilities emerging, and every developer will should accept as true with what could be applicable for his or her selected viewers or software. it's also clear that the adoption of these distinct run-time structures has the precise potential to reconstitute simple relationships to audiences and monetization programs.Video as a Cornerstone concern
Iâ€™m also commonly asked â€śWill HTML5 Video replace Flash Video?â€ť. Posited as a winner-take-all, absolute, the answer is clearly no. but like the nuance of HTML5 vs. Flash on the internet, there's also a extremely nuanced and complex evolving landscape in the video format world.
On the notebook/net, video has gained big momentum as a basic media type for all content on the net. This has generally been pushed by means of the adoption of Flash Video, which has approximately 75% market-share for on-line video. for most internet and content material app developers, this is quality, it's an outstanding run-time and offers an excellent person journey and Adobe has completed a superb job maintaining the platform modern with probably the most worrying wants of video beginning and first-class.
it's the speedy emergence of hand held gadgets, however, it truly is bringing this concern to the forefront. With huge increase in handheld internet looking from smartphones, iTouch devices and the pending iPad product, this has raised a deeper challenge for media publishers who are eager to have their content be obtainable to end-clients. In certain, it is the show-down between Apple, Google and Adobe over who can handle video codecs on these devices it really is creating challenges. once more, here is no longer about â€śwhat is the correct technical solutionâ€ť, it is concerning the political economic climate of who controls the formats that in flip result in possessing downstream viewers and monetization alternatives.
The basic conception at the back of HTML5 video is that there would be a common video format that can be positioned and rendered into any suitable net browser, conceptually changing the want for the Flash run-time to render video in browsers. however there are gigantic challenges with this, some political, some technical and some according to audience conduct.
First, right now, there is an absence of general strategy among browser makers on what layout to make use of for the HTML video object. This lack of contract represents a proxy for broader political battles. Apple promotes MPEG-4/H.264, which it makes use of for itâ€™s gadget systems. Microsoft promotes VC-1, itâ€™s personal typical video codec. Google has yet to completely weigh-in on what layout to guide, which leads me to speculate that they're going to quickly introduce a new structure, according to On2 VP8, however under a wide open supply license to the format and know-how. Firefox, with 24% share of the browser market, proposes to make use of the open source Ogg Vorbis codec. What few individuals understand is that while H.264 appears to be an open and free common, in certainty it isn't. it's a standard offered by means of the MPEG-LA consortsia, and is governed through industrial and IP restrictions, with a purpose to in 2014 impose a royalty and license requirement on all clients of the know-how. How can the open web undertake a layout that has such restrictions? it could possiblyâ€™t. Google will make an end-run on this by way of launching an open structure with an open supply license for the know-how, which in keeping with trade experts supplies pretty much the entire identical technical advantages as H.264. All of here's an extended manner of asserting that there continues to be colossal layout tension and that it will take a very long time for it to be resolved in next-gen browsers.
2d, however linked, is the raw fact of browser adoption and churn cycles, and the fact that online video publishers will only adopt requirements that have extremely extensive adoption. until penetration charges constantly attain 80%, it might be complicated for publishers to swap and undertake a single, new answer. it is greater possible that HTML5 Video adoption will reach that important mass on handheld gadgets before it does on the computing device/web.
Third, and equally vital, is the extra useful subject of the massive industry-huge ecosystem assist for Flash Video. From promoting codecs, to company logic for the interaction of video with adverts and analytics, a whole bunch of 3rd celebration know-how agencies who've constructed solutions round on-line video which are constructed on Flash, not to point out excessive satisfactory design and authoring tools that take a seat at the core of a huge labor marketplace for Flash design and construction; all of this creates inertia for Flash and a relatively high industry-extensive switching can charge.
but stepping again and looking at this principally in the context of hand held computing, where Apple is politically prompted to block the Flash runtime, it's obvious video publishers might be driven to construct and operate options that leverage HTML5 Video on cellular and iPad looking environments.Itâ€™s All About reach
whether on the supply aspect of content and functions, or on the distribution and run-time facet of the equation, what is abundantly clear is that attain is still king. For platform makers, these battles will continue as they all are seeking for to drive ample reach for their open and proprietary specifications such that they can exploit this distribution for his or her core business goals. Likewise, and more important, anything requisites and fashions deliver the broadest reach will subsequently pressure what's adopted by publishers, builders and ISVs.
whereas it is easy to take a binary place in the future of content functions and run-times, it is evident that the competing pastimes of platform companies, buyers and app and content publishers will be sure that this remains a fragmented and competitive ambiance for a long time to return.
money owed of his anti-Adobe rants carry questions about what truly motivates them
I haven't any doubt that Steve Jobs is at least in part trustworthy when he complains to his staff and the gossipy editors on the Wall road Journal about Flash, the multimedia platform Apple pointedly refuses to support on the iPhone, the iPod contact and the approaching iPad pill desktop.
with his penchant for simplicity and elegance, Jobs might also very smartly trust that the ubiquitous net animation utility is â€śbuggy,â€ť a â€śCPU hog,â€ť â€śfull of safety holes,â€ť â€śa dying know-how,â€ť the reason for most Mac crashes, and that the Adobe engineers liable for it are â€ślazy,â€ť as nameless sources have mentioned to Wired, Valleywag and in other places.
however ditching Flash â€” which generates roughly seventy five% of the video on the net â€” and replacing it with MPEG-4/H.264 isn't, as Jobs claims, â€śtrivial,â€ť and that i suspect he knows it. Nor would helping Flash necessarily reduce the iPadâ€™s pronounced 10-hour battery lifestyles to 1.5 hours, as he is talked about to have claimed.
Of route there are other motives Jobs hates Flash â€” company explanations.
As Holman Jenkins brought up in the Journal every week after Jobs met with its editors,
â€śFlash would also enable iPhone and iPad users to devour video and different enjoyment with out going through iTunes. Flash would let clients freely obtain the sorts of aspects they can only get now at the Apple App store.â€ť
but Apple makes most of its cash selling hardware, now not 99-cent apps. Whatâ€™s truly going, in accordance Brightcove CEO Jeremy Allaire, is a battle for power and manage among the many cyber webâ€™s dominant platform organizations: Apple (AAPL), Adobe (ADBE), Google (GOOG) and Microsoft (MSFT).
Allaire lays it all out in a 2,200-be aware visitor publish that became published with the aid of TechCrunch two weeks in the past:
â€śeach of those organizations seeks to create unique runtimes and APIs that give a strategic wedge that can drive different elements of their company,â€ť he wrote. â€śAt one degree this is a fight for the hearts and minds of builders and ISVs, however these developers are in basic terms a means to an conclusion. Gaining large adoption for their runtime systems translates into their potential to create big spinoff value via downstream items and features. For Apple, this is hardware and paid media (content material and apps) earnings. For Google, here is about growing massive attain for their advertising systems and products. For Adobe, this about creating major new applications companies based on their platform. For Microsoft, it is about driving unit income of their core OS and business functions.â€ť
For Apple watchers drawn to understanding Jobsâ€™ obsession with Flash, itâ€™s a have to-examine. that you would be able to get it right here.
observe: Allaire spent two years as chief expertise officer at Macromedia, the place he helped improve the Macromedia MX platform that changed into released in Flash player 6.
replace: Roughly Draftedâ€™s Daniel Eran Dilger has posted a comment by means of Morgan Adams, a developer who is aware of a whole lot about building apps in Flash. Adams suggests that the precise difficulty with Flash is that it doesnâ€™t work â€” and mayâ€™t readily be made to work â€” with the iPad (or for that matter the iPhone) on account of the â€śhover and mouseoverâ€ť difficulty. See right here.
[Follow Philip Elmer-DeWitt on Twitter @philiped]
Whilst it is very hard task to choose reliable exam questions / answers resources regarding review, reputation and validity because people get ripoff due to choosing incorrect service. Killexams. com make it certain to provide its clients far better to their resources with respect to exam dumps update and validity. Most of other peoples ripoff report complaint clients come to us for the brain dumps and pass their exams enjoyably and easily. We never compromise on our review, reputation and quality because killexams review, killexams reputation and killexams client self confidence is important to all of us. Specially we manage killexams.com review, killexams.com reputation, killexams.com ripoff report complaint, killexams.com trust, killexams.com validity, killexams.com report and killexams.com scam. If perhaps you see any bogus report posted by our competitor with the name killexams ripoff report complaint internet, killexams.com ripoff report, killexams.com scam, killexams.com complaint or something like this, just keep in mind that there are always bad people damaging reputation of good services due to their benefits. There are a large number of satisfied customers that pass their exams using killexams.com brain dumps, killexams PDF questions, killexams practice questions, killexams exam simulator. Visit Killexams.com, our test questions and sample brain dumps, our exam simulator and you will definitely know that killexams.com is the best brain dumps site.
C5050-062 free pdf | 000-933 VCE | 3X0-201 free pdf | 117-304 examcollection | 4H0-435 study guide | 000-154 test prep | BAS-011 braindumps | 190-848 questions and answers | 1Z0-054 braindumps | MOS-A2K real questions | 000-818 test questions | 000-611 questions answers | HP2-E26 practice exam | DCPPE-200 practice questions | E20-060 practice questions | C9520-423 braindumps | FCBA dump | 1Z0-595 practice test | S90-18A real questions | LOT-910 cheat sheets |
Just study these 9A0-602 Questions and study guide
killexams.com propose you to must attempt its free demo, you will see the common UI and besides you will surmise that its easy to change the prep mode. Regardless, guarantee that, the real 9A0-602 exam has a bigger number of questions than the example exam. killexams.com offers you three months free updates of 9A0-602 Certified Macromedia Flash MX 2004 Developer exam questions. Our affirmation group is continually available at back end who refreshes the material as and when required.
If you are inquisitive about success passing the Adobe 9A0-602 exam to begin earning? killexams.com has forefront developed Certified Macromedia Flash MX 2004 Developer test questions that will make sure you pass this 9A0-602 exam! killexams.com delivers you the foremost correct, current and latest updated 9A0-602 exam questions and out there with a 100 percent refund guarantee. There are several firms that offer 9A0-602 brain dumps however those are not correct and latest ones. Preparation with killexams.com 9A0-602 new questions will be a best thing to pass this certification test in straightforward means. killexams.com Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under; WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for all exams on website PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders larger than $69 DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders larger than $99 SEPSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for All Orders We are all cognizant that a significant drawback within the IT business is there's an absence of quality study dumps. Our test preparation dumps provides you everything you will have to be compelled to take a certification test. Our Adobe 9A0-602 exam offers you with test questions with verified answers that replicate the actual test. These Questions and Answers offer you with the expertise of taking the particular exam. prime quality and worth for the 9A0-602 exam. 100% guarantee to pass your Adobe 9A0-602 exam and acquire your Adobe certification. we have a tendency at killexams.com are committed to assist you pass your 9A0-602 exam with high scores. the probabilities of you failing your 9A0-602 exam, once memorizing our comprehensive test dumps are little.
High Quality 9A0-602 products: we have our experts Team to ensure our Adobe 9A0-602 exam questions are always the latest. They are all very familiar with the exams and testing center.
How we keep Adobe 9A0-602 exams updated?: we have our special ways to know the latest exams information on Adobe 9A0-602. Sometimes we contact our partners who are very familiar with the testing center or sometimes our customers will email us the most recent feedback, or we got the latest feedback from our dumps market. Once we find the Adobe 9A0-602 exams changed then we update them ASAP.
Money back guarantee?: if you really fail this 9A0-602 Certified Macromedia Flash MX 2004 Developer and donâ€™t want to wait for the update then we can give you full refund. But you should send your score report to us so that we can have a check. We will give you full refund immediately during our working time after we get the Adobe 9A0-602 score report from you.
Adobe 9A0-602 Certified Macromedia Flash MX 2004 Developer Product Demo?: we have both PDF version and Software version. You can check our software page to see how it looks like.
killexams.com Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for all exams on website
PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
DECSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for All Orders
When will I get my 9A0-602 material after I pay?: Generally, After successful payment your username/password are sent at your email address within 5 min. But if there is any delay in bank side for payment authorization, then it takes little longer.
Killexams CAT-380 practice questions | Killexams 1D0-61B dumps questions | Killexams ESPA-EST brain dumps | Killexams 132-S-900 practice questions | Killexams 9A0-409 real questions | Killexams P2140-021 cheat sheets | Killexams HPE2-E55 questions answers | Killexams 000-117 real questions | Killexams HP0-D08 cram | Killexams HP2-H25 practice test | Killexams HP2-T29 study guide | Killexams 9A0-164 brain dumps | Killexams A2040-408 bootcamp | Killexams C9520-911 free pdf | Killexams CoreSpringV3.2 test questions | Killexams P8060-001 questions and answers | Killexams CBAP test prep | Killexams 1Z0-333 practice test | Killexams 000-113 exam questions | Killexams MB4-212 practice exam |
Killexams HP0-648 practice test | Killexams ST0-12W brain dumps | Killexams 4H0-004 real questions | Killexams 190-738 pdf download | Killexams P9530-089 braindumps | Killexams 70-412 bootcamp | Killexams 190-702 test prep | Killexams 920-805 Practice test | Killexams 000-917 braindumps | Killexams C9010-260 test prep | Killexams 77-887 real questions | Killexams M2010-760 examcollection | Killexams 000-224 dumps | Killexams HP2-B76 test prep | Killexams 000-M06 study guide | Killexams 000-972 practice exam | Killexams PEGACSA71V1 practice questions | Killexams PDM-2002001060 dumps questions | Killexams 642-373 study guide | Killexams M9520-233 brain dumps |
Flash traces its beginnings to an animation tool called FutureSplash, debuted by FutureWave Software in 1992. By 1996, Disney Online was using FutureSplash for animated content on its subscription based online service Disney Daily Blast. In December of 1996, Macromedia bought FutureWave Software and FutureSplash Animator, the design tool at the heart of the technology, became Macromedia Flash 1.0.
Over the next several years, Macromedia issued several updates to Flash. Most of these were improvements that have changed the nature of Flash from a simple Web drawing and animation package to a full multimedia development environment. The biggest leap forward took place in March 2002 when Macromedia released the Flash MX developer tool in tandem with Flash Player 6. The application and associated software made a whole host of new rich media applications availableâ€”including Web-based e-commerce forms and compatibility with mobile devices.
The latest Flash upgrade hit the market in summer 2003. Plug-ins to Flash Player 6 and the new Flash Player 7 made other new applications possible, such as a module where online shoppers could save information seen in a rich media animation to their hard drives for subsequent view. These enhancements took place in the new Flash MX 2004 developer environment, released at the same time. PriceGrabber.com was an early adopter.
The Way It Streams From Here
The earliest days of the Web were characterized by what is commonly described as â€śstaticâ€ť mediaâ€”text and still photos, little more than â€śbrochurewareâ€ť on a computer screen.
In the mid-1990s, the Internet exploded from a text-based system to one that contained pictures, even sounds, videos and animations
When a company then known as Progressive Networks first released RealAudio 1.0 in 1995, at the National Association of Broadcasters annual convention, everything changed. Although early versions were far less advanced than todayâ€™s state-of-the-art RealOne, people could first hear sounds, and later see images over the Internetâ€”not via download but at the time the actual event occurred or the content was delivered. This so-called streaming media technology not only enabled real-time witnessing of audio and video images on the Web, but also listening and viewing on demand without having to wait for lengthy download times of the earlier audio and video delivery. With this streaming technology, the Web user could enjoy the content immediately, as it was being â€śstreamed. Almost immediately after it was released, RealAudio became the Webâ€™s most popular standard for audio broadcasting.
In April 1997, Progressive Networks took another transcending step, launching RealVideo. Immediately, it changed the way videos are transmitted over the Internet, from time-consuming downloads to real-time viewing. The product was bundled with RealAudio in RealPlayer 4.0. For the productâ€™s debut, three short films featuring acclaimed director Spike Lee were offered on the site of what was then Progressive Networks. Within 24 hours, viewers downloaded more than 100,000 copies of RealPlayer 4.0.
Progressive Networks changed its name to RealNetworks in September 1997. The fact that RealAudio and RealVideo both made it possible to see and hear content over the Web in â€śrealâ€ť time was a major impetus for this new identity.
RealNetworks released RealPlayer 5.0 in October 1997. RealPlayer G2, a quantum leap in streaming media technology, made its entry in October 1998. Subsequent versions have been released about every 18 months since then. RealOne, the latest version of RealPlayer, made its debut in 2001.
Microsoft was soon on Progressive Networks' heels. NetShow made its debut in September 1996 as a streaming media-playing companion to primitive, built-in Media Player technology included since the earliest versions of Windows. The division of labor was thus: NetShow played the streams, and Media Player was used to play audio content, such as tracks on a music CD that a user placed in his or her PC's CD drive.
NetShow's first edition, known as NetShow 1.0, had basic streaming media audio technology, including access to a few of the streaming radio stations who were offering their programming over the Internet. The release was widely seen as a competitive reaction against RealPlayer, the leading streaming media software at the time. RealPlayer, from RealNetworks (then known as Progressive Networks), first appeared in 1995.
At that time, Microsoft promoted NetShow more as a platform for developers to design streaming media content than for consumers to listen and watch such content. The company replicated the strategy in NetShow 2.0, which came out in 1997. Some 11 million people downloaded NetShow that year, and were able to take advantage of the updated versionâ€™s better use of bandwidth.
Bandwidth improvement took a leap forward with the release of NetShow 3.0 in mid-1998. The company had bought a streaming media player company called Vextreme in late 1997, an acquisition that gave it new tools for managing bandwidth-intensive streaming video content. Providers such as CNN, Fox News and MSNBC signed aboard to deliver video to site visitors with NetShow 3.0 on their desktops.
NetShow kept working on gradual improvements. In October 1999, Microsoft re-branded NetShow into a full streaming media product known as Windows Media Player 6. Unlike NetShow, the new WMP ran on Microsoft's proprietary streaming audio and video formats, and brought the former functions of Media Player in to form an all-in-one media player solution.
Windows Media Player 7 came to the market in the summer of 2000, offering enhanced streaming audio and video playback, compatibility with MP3 files, and, befitting Napster's huge popularity at that time, a built-in CD burner. Media guides where users could search for streaming audio and video content on the Web were embedded into WMP 7. For the first time, users could also customize their copy of WMP by choosing from a library of more than 20 skins.
Microsoft never released a "Windows Media Player 8" as such, instead branding "8" as a developer tool for improved audio and video encoding. Although it was still called Windows Media Player 7, a de facto "8" version was bundled into the then-new Windows XP operating system in October 2001. This edition was compatible with the enhanced audio and video codecs built into Windows Media Audio and Video 8.
Everything changed in January 2003 with the official release of Windows Media Player 9. The main improvements were for the ability of the user to customize his or her experiences. Here was streaming media software with mini-player mode, queue-it-up, cross-fading, auto-volume leveling, variable speed playback, auto playlists and ratings. It also added support for new Windows Media Audio 9 lossless, variable bit-rate (VBR) encoding, sound distortion reduction HDCD (High Definition Compatible Digital) playback technology and "video smoothing" technology for content encoded at comparatively low bit rates. A big help for consumers with comparatively slow, dial-up connections, the video smoothing technology built into Windows Media Player 9 smoothes out streams by inserting interpolated (estimated range of display characteristics) frames into content.
Apple Computer followed a somewhat different path to the streaming media competitive marketplace. The company first rolled out QuickTime in 1992 as software that would primarily play rich media files the user had already downloaded to their computer. Apple maintained that the main advantage of this method over streaming was that since the file being played was being generated from the user's computers, playback was not compromised by the vagaries of inconsistent Internet connections at low speeds.
As more customers obtained fast broadband connections, and as streaming media software showed it was here to stay, Apple upgraded QuickTime with streaming media playback capability. The first version of QuickTime with the capacity to play streaming files directly from the Internet was QuickTime 4.0, released in September 1999.
Apple has issued two substantial upgrades since then. The latest version, QuickTime 6.4, was released in September, 2003. It includes support for mobile rich media content as well as MPEG-4 technology, an enhanced digital compression technique for encoding rich multimedia content.Â
Agency: Rassak Experience
Sample coverage: The New York Times, San Francisco Chronicle, NPR, Scobleizer
Campaign: Exploiting America's obsession with last year's presidential race -- and perhaps offering a humorous tonic for those bored with the election -- BigFix offered up Ray Hopewood, a fictional candidate who mocked the absurdity of non-stop political ads while subtly touting the virtues of the company's enterprise software offerings. Hopewood had his own Facebook page, videos, and merchandise. And as the real presidential race heated up, BigFix kept pace with new "developments" from its candidate.
What set it apart: During last year's election season, there was no shortage of campaigns that sought to use the political event to their own advantage. But what made the difference for BigFix was the genuine nature of the campaign, says Barak Kassar, president of Rassak Experience.
"A key mistake is to lose sight of the actual digital human experience you are creating for people," Kassar says. "We climbed into the skin of our viewer, and we sweated every detail of how this campaign would first appear to a person, and how it would unfold. Was the first eighth of an eighth of a second going to feel just right? And would it get better and better along the way?"
That strategy paid off, according to Kassar, who says some European users who weren't closely following the American election actually believed Hopewood to be the genuine article after seeing some banner ads. But more than that, Kassar insists that the key was that the campaign offered real touchpoints (including a Facebook page, Flickr photos, and a blog) that enabled people and reporters to engage on their own terms.
Advice: "Never bank on media coverage and never, ever bank on viral," Kassar says. "Both are gifts, and if you believe you deserve them, you will get hurt. All you can do is make something as good and human as you can. Treat the audience as human beings and treat reporters as human beings."
Brand: BBQ Addicts
Sample coverage: The New York Times, Akron Beacon Journal, Toronto Star
Campaign: After receiving a Twitter challenge to do something with bacon, BBQ fanatics Jason Day and Aaron Chronister set about creating the now infamous Bacon Explosion. But what began as a recipe disseminated through their website, BBQAddicts.com, and a few tweets, grew into a full-blown media frenzy, aided in part by America's obsession with outrageous Super Bowl snacks. The campaign helped drive traffic to the duo's blog, which has helped Chronister and Day turn their passion for BBQ into a full-time job.
What set it apart: There are a lot of crazy, pork-filled recipes floating around the internet, but according to Chronister, the Bacon Explosion took off because of three critical factors.
The first factor, Chronister says, was timing. With a launch date so close to the Super Bowl, BBQ Addicts gave legions of foodie football fans an exciting new dish to bring to their halftime party.
The second factor, according to Chronister, was the name, which even he admits is a little over the top. But, he says, one can't deny the power of an over-the-top name when it comes to grabbing the attention of an internet audience.
But the third factor -- which one could easily define as guilty-pleasure syndrome -- is what made Bacon Explosion, well, explode. "In reality, the recipe is very good (in moderation, of course)," Chronister says. "People were thinking, 'Who on Earth would eat that?' But in reality, they actually wanted one."
In other words, Bacon Explosion offered the shock value of something absurd, but behind the unusual recipe was a dish many people secretly wanted to try. That combination offered a kind of one-two punch, enabling BBQ Addicts to lead with a zany concept while delivering something of substance.
Advice: To push the campaign, BBQ Addicts relied heavily on social networking tools like Twitter and Facebook. But, according to Chronister, many brands often misuse those platforms.
"Many companies haven't embraced the real nature of social networking and are hesitant due to fear of backlash," Chronister explains. "What they need to understand is any feedback at all is good, even negative responses. It's an instant survey and one of the fastest ways to improve whatever it is they're offering. All markets consist of human beings who like to be involved, and many times companies are pushing too much of a corporate message instead of a human message. They need to stop being afraid of their customers and start building relationships."
In BBQ Addicts' case, that relationship led to a conversation, which turned into a challenge, which in turn became a recipe that put the blog on the map.
Sample coverage: Fort Worth Business Press, Star-Telegram, ABA Journal (print)
Campaign: Hollywood it's not. But North Texas is home to one of the more unusual and risky bank campaigns anyone has ever seen. Rather than spending money on a traditional print and radio buy to advertise the bank's latest programs, Worthington (a regional bank) made four short films for YouTube, including a finale that mimicked a Western-style bank robbery. The mock robbery -- something most banks would shy away from -- was foiled by the bank's employees, who used their customer service skills to charm the thieves into submission.
The campaign relied almost entirely on local press coverage to drive customers to the bank's website and YouTube page.
What set it apart: While the numbers on the campaign were small (North Texas isn't the same as going national), Worthington Bank CEO Greg Morse says the YouTube videos were a success because they took risks few brands in the space ever dream of taking.
"We were at a bank conference two years ago and noticed that the advertising for smaller banks was pretty lame," Morse says. "The videos were made purposely to incorporate situations one wouldn't necessarily associate with a bank, like a day at the beach. They were made to showcase as much personality as possible (again, something not generally associated with banks). We aimed to make the campaign as unexpected as possible because people always talk about the things that surprise them."
That tactic worked, and many local reporters took note of a bank talking -- albeit in jest -- about bank robberies. According to Morse, that buzz helped energize existing customers and bring in new clients who were looking for a more personal relationship with their local bank.
Advice: While Morse attributes much of the campaign's success to the surprise factor, he also believes that using employees as actors in the ads made a big difference. "Using real-life employees added a bit of human interest and upped the news value of the story," Morse explains.
The use of employees also helped sell the bank's message of personable customer service, something Morse believes is best kept out of the hands of paid actors who are less likely to appear genuine.
Sample coverage: Salon, The New York Times, Advertising Age (subscription required)
Campaign: If an award-winning director made three short films that just happened to include passing reference to Honda, the result would likely be the "Dream the Impossible" campaign, which asked consumers to join the automaker in an exploration of themes that reflect the brand's core values. One video, which touched upon the company's mission of transportation, speculated on what a car brand might mean in the year 2088. Another video, which highlighted Honda's passion for innovation, took the unusual tact of probing the role of failure in achieving technological breakthroughs.
What set it apart: While a number of car brands have dabbled in short films (most notably BMW), few have taken the bold step of making an earnest documentary that barely features the brand name at all. But that's exactly what J Barbush, RPA's VP and associate creative director, wanted to achieve with "Dream the Impossible."
"We liked the feel of the documentary," Barbush says. "It allowed for a very soft message, which was important because we didn't want this campaign to be about Honda, we wanted it to be about the philosophy of Honda."
According to Barbush, the focus on Honda's philosophy -- and how it relates to stories of regular people -- helped get bloggers and reporters writing not just about Honda the company, but about Honda the brand and, more importantly, what it meant.
"It wasn't just about presenting feel-good stories," Barbush explains. "People responded the most to the film about failure, and that makes sense because that's part of reality."
Advice: While Honda's bold creative (notably its decision to confront failure) may not be palatable for every brand, Barbush does believe that one takeaway all marketers can use has to do with the vast size and scope of the web. According to Barbush, one of the keys to the campaign was that Honda didn't try to keep the conversation confined to its site.
"We used the full web; it's a big place," Barbush says. "For this campaign, we pushed comments to YouTube because they just didn't fit on our site. Marketers shouldn't be afraid to take people away from the destination. That may mean you're soft on metrics, but you need to look at the bigger picture to see where people are going and engage them there."
Brand: Colt 45
Agency: Cole & Weber United
Sample coverage: MSNBC,Â LA Weekly, LiquorSnob.com
Campaign: Looking to focus on a young, hip demographic, Colt 45 (perhaps best known as Billy Dee Williams' preferred malt liquor) used a microsite http://www.workseverytime.com/home/default.aspx, an underground comic book aesthetic, a painfully honest tagline ("Works every time"), and a partnership with Vice Magazine to share stories that revolve around the beverage.Â
What set it apart: "If you talk to people who drink Colt 45, one truth immediately comes to the surface -- they always have a story to tell," says Britt Peterson, partner at Cole & Weber United.
While those stories often involve a kind of drunken debauchery not commonly voiced in most alcoholic beverage ads, Peterson says the campaign worked because it didn't get in the way of how people actually use the product or try to force an artificial image. But the story-based approach also gave the campaign a life of its own because it asked people to share their experiences, which in turn prompted numerous reporters and bloggers to joke about their own memories of drinking Colt 45. While that may have made for some tongue-in-cheek coverage, it did garner press nonetheless, which helped make the brand relevant for a hipper demographic.
Advice: Stories aside, one critical factor for any campaign seeking to get press coverage is its ability to exploit something happening in social culture right now. "If you're tapping into something that's really happening, you have a good chance to get some media attention," Peterson says.
In Colt's case, the beverage resonated with budget-conscious hipsters because the low price was an implicit part of a highly stylized message, rather than overt offer of savings. The result was a message that was more of a genuine cultural contribution than an ad, at least as far as the target audience was concerned.
Michael EstrinÂ is an editor at BitterLawyer.com.
Participatory cultureThere is no question that the notion of "media as a social affair" has caused one of the most profound climate changes for marketers in the last 50 years. Despite social media's weighty impact, one could make the argument that it is part of a larger trend that has existed long before the coining of the term "social media" (or more specifically, its use in common parlance).
In 2006, Henry Jenkins co-authored a white paper entitled "Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century." Many marketers pay lip service to Jenkins' work, but when you see the initiatives that some deploy, it becomes obvious that many have not bothered to actually read it. Toward the beginning of the white paper, Jenkins gives a definition of participatory culture. It is defined as a culture:
As marketers strive to reap the benefits of the viral nature of content that is produced within a participatory culture, they tend to forget many of the ideas laid out above. Marketers seem to continuously fall short on the following points:
Platform thinkingThere was a time, not too long ago, when the word fragmentation conjured up feelings of terror in seasoned marketers everywhere. For those marketers who continue to fight to maintain their old ways of doing things, may I present Bob Dylan:
Come gather 'round peopleWherever you roamAnd admit that the watersAround you have grownAnd accept it that soonYou'll be drenched to the bone.If your time to youIs worth savin'Then you better start swimmin'Or you'll sink like a stoneFor the times they are a-changin'.-Bob Dylan, 1963
As a new generation of marketers takes the strategic reins, fragmentation is becoming less of a hot topic, but why? This new generation of marketers is used to living in a world where media is consumed in numerous ways, through numerous devices, whenever it is convenient. Although fragmented media consumption has become the rule, not the exception, many marketers still struggle with the ability to tell effective stories across platforms. Channel integration and transmedia storytellingÂ are no longer just interesting concepts for marketers to consider. Distributed storytelling across various channels is absolutely essential in creating effective communications strategies in today's media landscape. The age of platform thinking is here.Â
As defined in this forum, platform thinking refers to a non-linear but holistic approach to storytelling. This approach differs from integrated marketing in that, traditionally, integrated marketing refers to a holistic approach where consistency of message is of the utmost importance. The platform approach differs in that elements are delivered at different times and in different places, each in service of a larger story arc.
When assessing the importance of platform thinking, one must consider that the internet is now everywhere.Â The current media landscape is experiencing a rapid divergence in the types of devices we use, but the content spread across these devices is similar, yet packaged differently. The day will soon come when our devices will be smart enough to detect content and automatically fit it for the particular device it is being accessed from. But we are at a crossroads, a challenging time in which it is the marketer's job to ensure that all communications can be accessed everywhere, in a way that makes sense for the way in which it is being accessed, and increasingly, at the time and place it is accessed.Â Branded utilityA concept near and dear to my heart, branded utility is, in my opinion, one of the most important aspects of advertising and marketing innovation. In a world of infinite alternatives, even quality can become a commodity. Brands that push out products of similar quality to their competition need to find new ways to differentiate. This fact challenges marketers to ask the question, "What more can I do to add value?"
Given the weight of this concept, it is not easy to achieve. It is also not possible to create branded utility all the time without becoming redundant. While all marketing initiatives cannot be branded utility (you actually see very few examples in the market that truly fit the definition), the idea behind this trend is incredibly powerful and possesses an unparalleled ability to create strong ties with consumers. The core tenets behind branded utility should be considered in every marketing effort.Â
As a concept, branded utility is possibly the closest of the three trends discussed in this article to the idea of innovation because both branded utility and innovation require creativity and have the mandate of using this creativity to serve a purpose (other than simply being creative).
Who is joining me at ad:tech and what you will hearOne of the best parts of this ad:tech experience is meeting new, really smart people. While the details are subject to change, you can plan on hearing from the following industry rock stars, among others:
Obi Felten, head of consumer marketing, Google UKBen Malbon, executive director of innovation, BBH New YorkJerome Austria, interactive creative director, Wieden+Kennedy NYCJason Clement, director of digital strategy, Wieden+Kennedy NYCIvan Askwith, director of strategy, Big Spaceship
If that is not enough to whet your appetite, here are a few of the case studies you will hear about:
Watch video here.
I look forward to seeing you at this groundbreaking event. Keep in mind, this track is not just about people speaking at you. There will be a conversational portion. Furthermore, I will be sure to set up necessary back channels to start the dialog before the event, and continue it afterwards.
Adam BroitmanÂ is partner and ringleader at Circ.us.
On Twitter? Follow iMedia at @iMediaTweet.
Editorâ€™s note: This is a guest post written by Jeremy Allaire, founder and CEO of Brightcove. Prior to Brightcove, Jeremy founded Allaire Corporation which was subsequently acquired by Macromedia due to the success of their web development tool ColdFusion. At Macromedia, Jeremy helped create the Macromedia MX (Flash) platform. You can see a recent interview of Jeremy here. As one of the guys who helped build the Flash Platform, we asked him to weigh in on the recent HTML5 v. Flash debate.
The recent introduction of the new Apple iPad has stirred the discussion over the future of web content and application runtime formats, and shone light onto the political and business battles emerging between Apple, Adobe and Google. These discussion are often highly polarized and irrational. My hope in this post is to help provide some balance and clarity onto this discussion.
I have a particularly unique perspective, stake and role in this discussion. My first company (Allaire) was born during the advent of the Web, with the idea that a browser and HTML could form the basis for creating content-rich, interactive software applications, ones that didnâ€™t require native code and could be platform and operating system independent. We built ColdFusion as a way to realize this vision. We later became deeply committed to the world of HTML as a developer format, acquiring and building HomeSite, what was the worldâ€™s dominant Windows-based HTML authoring application.
In 2000, it became clear to me that web applications and runtimes were not advancing fast enough, and that with the emerging world of broadband internet connectivity that an entirely new realm of rich internet applications would be possible. We (Allaire and Macromedia) merged our companies with the vision that a new class of browser-based applications would emerge, and that we could evolve Macromedia Flash Player from its origins as an animation and motion-graphics engine into a real application platform and rich client runtime that fused media (text, audio, images, video), communications (web services, real-time APIs) and interactivity (rich client-side object model and UI component framework). In March of 2002 we launched the Macromedia MX Platform, anchored around the new Flash runtime, and realized this vision for the transformation of the Web experience and enabling a new class of rich, browser-based applications.
Today, my company sits at the center of these new battles over the future of web content and app formats and runtimes. We work with thousands of media publishers who aim to maximize the distribution, reach and user opportunities with their content. This new re-fracturing of web content runtimes is creating challenges (and opportunities) for us and our peers.A Battle for the Hearts and Minds of Developers (and Audiences!)
I think itâ€™s critical to first frame and understand this discussion with the broader political economy of Internet software platforms. Most of the debate and discussion over HTML5 vs. Flash vs. Native Apps has little to do with what is the right technical approach, or whether something is open or closed, it has to do with the expressions of power and control that drive the businesses of the Internetâ€™s dominant platform companies â€” Apple, Adobe, Google and Microsoft.
Each of these companies seeks to create unique runtimes and APIs that provide a strategic wedge that can drive other aspects of their business. At one level this is a battle for the hearts and minds of developers and ISVs, but these developers are merely a means to an end. Gaining broad adoption for their runtime platforms translates into their ability to create massive derivative value through downstream products and services. For Apple, this is hardware and paid media (content and apps) sales. For Google, this is about creating massive reach for their advertising platforms and products. For Adobe, this about creating major new applications businesses based on their platform. For Microsoft, it is about driving unit sales of their core OS and business applications.Web Apps and Content
Iâ€™m often asked â€śWill HTML5 replace Flash?â€ť on the Web. The quick answer is no. However, there is a lot of nuance here and itâ€™s helpful to make the distinction between two broad classes of content applications that are deployed in browsers.
The second broad class of applications are what I would call Rich Media Apps. These kinds of applications include largely consumer-facing, audience and media centric experiences. In particular, this includes online video, rich media advertising and marketing, and online games (casual games). All of these kinds of applications are highly focused on having a great and immersive experience that just works, and the creators of these apps are very focused on audience reach â€” anything that impedes 100% consumer acceptance is a significant concern. Here, Flash is dominant. The unique runtime characteristics of Flash, combined with its incredible reach, has led these types of apps to become highly dependent on Flash, and massive amounts of the broadband economy are dependent on it. It seems unlikely that HTML5 would be at all positioned to replace Flash for these categories, though it is clearly worth watching how consistent rich media runtimes find their way into the HTML5+ standard. Right now, it is a non starter.The Handheld Disruption
Much of the above classes of content applications are in reference to the PC/Browser-based Web. The explosive growth in hand-held computing has introduced an entirely new dynamic into the content and app run-time battles which in turn will have a cascading impact on the PC Web. Hand-held computing includes smartphones (iPhone, Android, Nokia, et. al), portable music/entertainment devices and tablet computing devices (iPad and Android devices).
In many respects, the successful launch and growth of these devices has created an entirely new and largely blank canvas for content and applications. First, these devices offer new native services and OS-specific features (location, multi-touch UI, local media, wireless networking APIs, cameras, offline) that are giving birth to a massive new class of non-Web Apps that are built using proprietary native-code APIs and runtimes. Because of always-on broadband connectivity and easy to discovery App Stores, there has been rapid adoption of these new â€śdisposable content appsâ€ť.
Hand-held platforms create a new opportunity for platform vendors to disrupt runtime hegemony from platforms that have seen ascendance on the PC/Web, and controlling these new run-times and developer adoption of these runtimes has a direct impact on these platform vendors ability to own audience relationships and monetization opportunities. For example, a web-centric, HTML5-centric handheld world favors Google because it can leverage itâ€™s existing dominance in search and web advertising. A proprietary App-centric universe favors Apple because it can become the primary gatekeeper to reaching the mobile audience and already has a pole position in integrating payments and advertising into content applications.
In the case of hand-held platforms, however, it seems quite apparent that it is not a zero-sum game. Three runtime platforms will gain adoption and often even inter-mingle â€” HTML5 content and apps, Native Apps (that may contain Flash and HTML content), and HTML5 apps that contain and leverage Flash Player. There is a rich pallet of capabilities emerging, and each developer will need to consider what will be appropriate for their specific audience or application. It is also clear that the adoption of these diverse run-time platforms has the real potential to reconstitute fundamental relationships to audiences and monetization systems.Video as a Cornerstone Issue
Iâ€™m also often asked â€śWill HTML5 Video replace Flash Video?â€ť. Posited as a winner-take-all, absolute, the answer is clearly no. But like the nuance of HTML5 vs. Flash on the Web, there is also a very nuanced and complex evolving landscape in the video format world.
On the PC/Web, video has gained enormous momentum as a fundamental media type for all content on the Web. This has largely been driven by the adoption of Flash Video, which has approximately 75% market-share for online video. For most web and content app developers, this is fine, it is a great run-time and offers an excellent user experience and Adobe has done a very good job keeping the platform contemporary with the most demanding needs of video delivery and quality.
It is the rapid emergence of hand-held devices, however, that is bringing this issue to the forefront. With massive growth in hand-held web browsing from smartphones, iTouch devices and the pending iPad product, this has raised a deeper issue for media publishers who are eager to have their content be accessible to end-users. In particular, it is the show-down between Apple, Google and Adobe over who can control video formats on these devices that is creating challenges. Again, this is not about â€śwhat is the right technical solutionâ€ť, it is about the political economy of who controls the formats that in turn lead to owning downstream audience and monetization opportunities.
The basic idea behind HTML5 video is that there would be a common video format that could be placed and rendered into any compatible web browser, conceptually replacing the need for the Flash run-time to render video in browsers. But there are enormous challenges with this, some political, some technical and some based on audience behavior.
First, right now, there is a lack of common approach among browser makers on what format to use for the HTML video object. This lack of agreement represents a proxy for broader political battles. Apple promotes MPEG-4/H.264, which it uses for itâ€™s device platforms. Microsoft promotes VC-1, itâ€™s own standard video codec. Google has yet to fully weigh-in on what format to support, which leads me to speculate that they will soon introduce a new format, based on On2 VP8, but under a broad open source license to the format and technology. Firefox, with 24% share of the browser market, proposes to use the open source Ogg Vorbis codec. What few people realize is that while H.264 appears to be an open and free standard, in actuality it is not. It is a standard provided by the MPEG-LA consortsia, and is governed by commercial and IP restrictions, which will in 2014 impose a royalty and license requirement on all users of the technology. How can the open Web adopt a format that has such restrictions? It canâ€™t. Google will make an end-run on this by launching an open format with an open source license for the technology, which according to industry experts delivers almost all of the same technical benefits as H.264. All of this is a long way of saying that there is still significant format tension and that it will take a long time for it to be resolved in next-gen browsers.
Second, but related, is the raw reality of browser adoption and churn cycles, and the fact that online video publishers will only adopt standards that have extremely broad adoption. Until penetration rates consistently reach 80%, it will be hard for publishers to switch and adopt a single, new solution. It is more likely that HTML5 Video adoption will reach that critical mass on hand-held devices before it does on the PC/Web.
Third, and equally important, is the more practical issue of the massive industry-wide ecosystem support for Flash Video. From advertising formats, to business logic for the interaction of video with ads and analytics, hundreds of 3rd party technology companies who have built solutions around online video that are built on Flash, not to mention high quality design and authoring tools that sit at the center of a large labor market for Flash design and development; all of this creates inertia for Flash and a relatively high industry-wide switching cost.
But stepping back and looking at this specifically in the context of hand-held computing, where Apple is politically motivated to block the Flash runtime, it is apparent video publishers will be driven to build and operate solutions that leverage HTML5 Video on mobile and iPad browsing environments.Itâ€™s All About Reach
Whether on the supply side of content and applications, or on the distribution and run-time side of the equation, what is abundantly clear is that reach is still king. For platform makers, these battles will continue as they all seek to drive sufficient reach for their open and proprietary standards such that they can exploit this distribution for their core commercial goals. Likewise, and more important, whatever standards and models deliver the broadest reach will ultimately drive what is adopted by publishers, developers and ISVs.
While it is easy to take a binary position in the future of content applications and run-times, it is evident that the competing interests of platform vendors, consumers and app and content publishers will ensure that this remains a fragmented and competitive environment for many years to come.
NOTE: If a third party is serving the ad, please follow that vendor's instructions for coding the Flash click through. All the aspects of the ad (i.e. file size, animation, etc.) must be in accordance with CNNMoney.com ad specifications.
SWF Movie Requirements (for the Flash developer)For the most part, the movie is made like any other Flash movie. Any animation or ActionScript that would normally be used can be used with this method. The main difference is in the click through (getURL) actions.
SWF File RequirementsFlash version SWF files must be published as Flash 5, 6, or 7. We do not currently accept Flash 8.
FilenamesThe following characters should not be included in the filename:
AnimationFlash offers the ability to create additional animation on rollover. Our standard animations spec is 15 seconds, but Flash ads can additionally animate upon rollover, as long as the animation stops as soon as the user rolls off the ad.
Backup GIFDue to heavy Flash ads sniff, a backup GIF is required for every campaign to ensure smooth delivery.
getURL ActionsMacromedia currently recommends a "clickTag" method to track clicks for Flash ads. This method uses variables to pass the click tracking string and URL into Flash movies. As a result, the only text in the URL box is: "_level0.clickTag" (without the quotes). The _level0 part is included for 'pathing' purposesto ensure that Flash can properly locate the variable.
Because clickTag is a variable, the text that is entered into the URL box is an expression. When the movie plays, the expression will be evaluated and replaced with the click tracking string and the destination URL. For this method to function correctly in Flash 5 and Flash 6 (MX), indicate that the text is an expression by checking the expression check box. Note that there are two buttons or check boxes. One is for the URL and one is for the target window. Make sure that the button or check box for the URL is set correctly. In addition, set the Variables drop-down box to "Don't send." No special check boxes or drop down selections are required for Flash 7(MX 2004).
Because frames are sometimes used for serving ads, the target window for the click-through URL must be set to "_blank". If the target window is set incorrectly, the advertiser's site might appear in the ad frame. Never leave the target statement undeclared.
Upon submission, please denote a click-through URL for each ad in the e-mail body or in a spreadsheet. This URL will be used such that when a click through occurs, the browser will first contact the ad server to count the click and then go to the click-through site.
3COM [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
AccessData [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACFE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Acme-Packet [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACSM [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Admission-Tests [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
ADOBE [93 Certification Exam(s) ]
AFP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
AICPA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
AIIM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Alcatel-Lucent [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Alfresco [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Altiris [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Amazon [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
American-College [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Android [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
APA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
APC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
APICS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Apple [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
AppSense [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
APTUSC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Arizona-Education [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ARM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Aruba [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASIS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASQ [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASTQB [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
Autodesk [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Avaya [96 Certification Exam(s) ]
AXELOS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Axis [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Banking [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
BEA [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
BICSI [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
BlackBerry [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
BlueCoat [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Brocade [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Business-Objects [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
Business-Tests [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
CA-Technologies [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
Certification-Board [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Certiport [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
CheckPoint [41 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIPS [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cisco [318 Certification Exam(s) ]
Citrix [48 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIW [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cloudera [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cognos [19 Certification Exam(s) ]
College-Board [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
CompTIA [76 Certification Exam(s) ]
ComputerAssociates [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Consultant [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Counselor [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
CPP-Institue [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
CPP-Institute [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CSP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CWNA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CWNP [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Dassault [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
DELL [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
DMI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
DRI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ECCouncil [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
ECDL [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
EMC [129 Certification Exam(s) ]
Enterasys [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Ericsson [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
ESPA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Esri [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
ExamExpress [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Exin [40 Certification Exam(s) ]
ExtremeNetworks [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
F5-Networks [20 Certification Exam(s) ]
FCTC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Filemaker [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Financial [36 Certification Exam(s) ]
Food [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Fortinet [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Foundry [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
FSMTB [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Fujitsu [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
GAQM [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Genesys [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
GIAC [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Google [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
GuidanceSoftware [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
H3C [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
HDI [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Healthcare [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
HIPAA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hitachi [30 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hortonworks [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hospitality [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
HP [750 Certification Exam(s) ]
HR [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
HRCI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Huawei [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hyperion [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
IAAP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IAHCSMM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IBM [1532 Certification Exam(s) ]
IBQH [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ICAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ICDL [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
IEEE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IELTS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IFPUG [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
IIBA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
IISFA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Intel [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
IQN [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IRS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISACA [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISC2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISEB [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
Isilon [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISM [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
iSQI [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
ITEC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Juniper [64 Certification Exam(s) ]
LEED [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Legato [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
Liferay [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Logical-Operations [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Lotus [66 Certification Exam(s) ]
LPI [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
LSI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Magento [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Maintenance [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
McAfee [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
McData [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Medical [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
Microsoft [374 Certification Exam(s) ]
Mile2 [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Military [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Misc [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Motorola [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
mySQL [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
NBSTSA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCEES [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCLEX [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Network-General [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
NetworkAppliance [39 Certification Exam(s) ]
NI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NIELIT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Nokia [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Nortel [130 Certification Exam(s) ]
Novell [37 Certification Exam(s) ]
OMG [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Oracle [279 Certification Exam(s) ]
P&C [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Palo-Alto [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
PARCC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PayPal [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Pegasystems [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
PEOPLECERT [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
PMI [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Polycom [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
PostgreSQL-CE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Prince2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
PRMIA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PsychCorp [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PTCB [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
QAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
QlikView [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Quality-Assurance [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
RACC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Real-Estate [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
RedHat [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
RES [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
Riverbed [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
RSA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Sair [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
Salesforce [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
SANS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SAP [98 Certification Exam(s) ]
SASInstitute [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
SAT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SCO [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
SCP [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
SDI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
See-Beyond [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Siemens [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Snia [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
SOA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Social-Work-Board [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
SpringSource [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SUN [63 Certification Exam(s) ]
SUSE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Sybase [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
Symantec [134 Certification Exam(s) ]
Teacher-Certification [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
The-Open-Group [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
TIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Tibco [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
Trainers [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Trend [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
TruSecure [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
USMLE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
VCE [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Veeam [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Veritas [33 Certification Exam(s) ]
Vmware [58 Certification Exam(s) ]
Wonderlic [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Worldatwork [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
XML-Master [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Zend [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Dropmark : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/11939894
Wordpress : http://wp.me/p7SJ6L-19q
Youtube : https://youtu.be/1AXZcIwsnxA
Dropmark-Text : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/11970511
Vimeo : https://vimeo.com/236528485
Issu : https://issuu.com/trutrainers/docs/9a0-602
weSRCH : https://www.wesrch.com/business/prpdfBU1HWO000QRVI
Blogspot : http://killexams-braindumps.blogspot.com/2017/10/pass4sure-9a0-602-certified-macromedia.html
publitas.com : https://view.publitas.com/trutrainers-inc/once-you-memorize-these-9a0-602-q-a-you-will-get-100-marks
coursehero.com : "Excel"
Google+ : https://plus.google.com/112153555852933435691/posts/8sKxJQsrUbM?hl=en
Calameo : http://en.calameo.com/books/004923526afae7f341734
zoho.com : https://docs.zoho.com/file/51n5pf1a6fe5e0ac844aa9ee4b47c8cde3726
Box.net : https://app.box.com/s/zxxqaqwrkchwzy0egidv46ekit1ero9q